View Single Post
  #39  
Old 01-22-2003, 10:23 AM
Vigil's Avatar
Vigil Vigil is offline
Serious Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Right above the centre of the Earth
Posts: 744
I think that there is a difference between someone who physically and sexually abuses an eight year old and someone who has sex with a sexually mature but under eighteen child and again some one who looks at pictures of mature (physically) seventeen year olds.

I don't condone any of these acts and I am glad to say that none attract me in any way, though they do disgust me in varying degrees and this should be reflected in how the law deals with offenders.

I find it a double standard that it is legal to have sex with a seventeen year old, but if you look at a picture of this act you are a paedophile in the same group as baby-rapist and people want your eyes gauged out. This was the point about Elvis - he wasn't a paedophile for having sex with Priscilla at sixteen - but if he were still alive and looked at the pictures of it he would be. So looking at something is worse than doing it? Is it just me?
__________________
Vigil, if you were my husband, I would give you poison.

Madam, if you were my wife, I would take it.
Reply With Quote